Editon 7 CFW Newsletter
line Do you have questions or comments about this newsletter?
Contact the Editor! We love hearing from you.

Editor@cfww.org 

All articles are available in three easy to use formats to read off line!
PDF Print and Zip formats also available for off line reading and printing
PDF, Zip files and Print version!
line Contents:
From the desk
From the Editor's desk
Jill Weinstein
line
From the President's desk
Mitch Messer
Mailbag
Burkholderia cepacia
Deborah Henry
Conference Review
European Cystic Fibrosis Society Conference
Genetics
Screening Relatives of People with Cystic Fibrosis
Bob Williamson
line
Is there a Clinical Benefit to Neonatal Screening?
M.H. Cazes, G. Bellis, A. Nourry, E. Le Roux, S. Ravilly, A. Munck, F. Huet, and C. Marguet.
Film
A Yarn with Jaan: CF documentary film
Kate Treloar
Medical/Scientific
Prevention of Cross-Infection in Cystic Fibrosis
Claus Moser & Niels Høiby
CFW Update
CFW Receives $65,000 Grant from Chiron
Georgia Brown
line
Annual Golf Tournament line
CFW Grants
Country Close Up
Cystic Fibrosis in India
Christine Noke & Sushil Kumar Kabra
Physiotherapy
CF & Exercise: A Physiotherapist's Perspective
Peter Anderson
Alternative Medicine
Hypertonic Saline Research Peter Bye
Conference Review
New Horizons: Care of Body, Mind and Spirit Georgia Brown
Snippets & News
NUTRICIA joins the Burke Bear Campaign line
CFW Online Tools line
Williamson Reflects on CF Developments line
Saving Lives by Remote Control line
Vitamin D Repletion Regimen did not work line
Computerized Shirt Monitors Breathing
Burke Bear Campaign
Order your own Burke Bear
Subscription
Subscribe today and receive this Newsletter mailed to your door (English)
line

get CFW updates by email
GENETICS
Download PDF version
Download Zipped Word doc
Printable version

Is there a Clinical Benefit From
Neonatal Screening for CF?

By M.H. Cazes, G. Bellis, A. Nourry, E. Le Roux, S. Ravilly,
A. Munck, F. Huet, and C. Marguet

We report an interesting French research study, conducted between 1999 and 2003 by the Institut National d’Etudes Démographiques, that looked at a number of health outcomes in 564 six year old children with CF. Comparisons were made between:

Neonatal Screening Group (NS): a group of 126 children from French regions who were diagnosed as a result of neonatal screening,
Meconium Ileus Group (MI): a group of 103 children diagnosed through the presence of meconium ileus at birth,
Clinical Diagnostic Group (CS): a group of 335 children diagnosed later based on clinical symptoms.

Variables measured at 6 years of age were height and weight, BMI (body mass index); forced expiratory volume (FEV1) and forced vital capacity (FVC); Staphylococcus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization; number of outpatient visits, number of traditional hospitalizations, total number of “one day” admissions; use of intravenous antibiotic therapy, oxygen therapy, nebulised therapy, use of pancreatic enzyme, Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN).#, enteral nutrition* and lung transplant.

In addition the evolution of Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus colonization was recorded annually for each year for each of the three diagnostic groups.

The main findings were that Pseudomonas aeruginosa colonization was significantly less likely in the CF neonatal screening group, and more likely in the clinical diagnostic group. Nebulized therapy was therefore more commonly required in the clinically diagnosed group than the neonatal screening group. No difference was observed for any other parameters listed above and there was no difference in the prevalence of colonisation by Staphylococcus aureus.

Figure 1: Frequency of P. aeruginosa colonized patients according to age and diagnostic group (the three diagnostic groups are significantly different for the years 1, 3, 5, 6, and 7)

Most of the primary colonisations were diagnosed before the age of 3. The percentage of MI and CS colonized children increases later. Conversely, the percentage of NS children being ever colonized remained at a stable level from 15% to 20%. This result did not change when the children with a very early clinical diagnosis were considered in the analysis.

Research team at Institut National d’Etudes
Démographiques, Paris, France

The main result of this study suggests that neonatal screening might delay the time when many children are colonised by P. aeruginosa. However, the causes of the delay observed in P. aeruginosa colonization could not definitely be determined. The CF French registry did not specify whether P. aeruginosa colonization might be identified as chronic or intermittent, both being included in the analysis. Conversely, neonatal screening did not appear to affect the proportion of children with S. aureus colonization at age 6.

No difference between the groups was found in FEV1 as previously reported (Farrell et al 2003) and growth at age 6 conversely to that observed by Farrell et al, 2001. In conclusion, this report suggests that neonatal screening had a favourable effect on the lower airway P. aeruginosa colonization in this large cohort study, but does not provide an explanation for this significant finding.

Editor’s Note
# Total Parenteral Nutrition (TPN) is used for patients who cannot or should not get their nutrition through eating. TPN will drip through a needle or catheter placed in your vein for 10-12 hours, once a day or five times a week. TPN may include a combination of sugar and carbohydrates (for energy), proteins (for muscle strength), lipids (fat), electrolytes, and trace elements. Your solution may contain all or some of these substances, depending on your condition.

* Enteral Nutrition is another way people can receive the food they need. Also called “tube feeding,” enteral nutrition is a mixture of all the needed nutrients. It is thicker than parenteral nutrition and sometimes it looks like a milk shake. It is given through a tube in the stomach or small intestine.

For a full report on this study write to the editor at editor@cfww.org

References
1. Farrell et al, 2003. Broncho-pulmonary disease in children with cystic fibrosis after early or delayed diagnosis, Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2003 Nov 1;168(9):1100-8.

2. Farrell et al, 2001. Early diagnosis of cystic fibrosis through neonatal screening prevents severe malnutrition and improves long-term growth. Wisconsin Cystic Fibrosis Neonatal Screening Study Group. Pediatrics, 2001 Jan;107(1):1-13.

line
Did you find this article useful?
Please donate to support CFW projects.
Donate

Print this article
[click here]

for a printable version of this article